توقعات إسرائيلية بـ”رد سلبي” من حماس على مقترح الهدنة في غزة
ناقش كبار الوزراء الإسرائيليين خلال اجتماع مجلس الحرب، مساء الخميس، مقترح الهدنة في غزة، والذي يهدف لإطلاق سراح بعض المحتجزين لدى “حماس”، فيما كشفت مصادر عن اعتقاد سائد لدى القيادة الإسرائيلية بأن الحركة سترفض العرض الأخير.
وقال مسؤول إسرائيلي لصحيفة “تايمز أوف إسرائيل” إن هناك اعتقاداً سائداً بأن “حماس” سترفض الصفقة، وناقش مجلس الحرب هذا الاحتمال، وكذلك البدء المحتمل للعملية العسكرية التي تم التعهد بها منذ فترة طويلة في رفح، رغم الضغوط الدولية على إسرائيل.
عن الشرق
Reading this gave me a small framework I expect to use going forward, and a stop at claritybridge extended that framework, content that produces transferable mental models rather than just specific facts is content with multiplicative value and this site is providing those models at a rate that justifies extra attention from me regularly.
Liked the post enough to read it twice and the second read found new things, and a stop at momentumdesign similarly rewarded the second look, content with hidden depths that only reveal themselves on careful rereading is the rare kind that earns lasting respect rather than fleeting first impressions only briefly held.
Just want to flag that this was useful and not bury the appreciation in caveats, and a look at forwardtractioncreated earned the same direct praise, recognising good work without hedging it with criticism is something I try to practice because over qualified compliments tend to read as backhanded and miss the point sometimes.
Picked this post to share in a Slack channel where I knew it would be appreciated, and a look at focusdrivesexecution suggested I will share more from here later, content worth sharing into a professional context is content that has earned a higher kind of trust than mere personal interest and this site has it.
Really appreciate the confidence to make a clear point rather than hedging everything, and a quick visit to growthwithintent maintained the same direct stance, writing that takes positions rather than equivocating is more useful even when the positions are debatable because at least the reader has something to react to clearly.